College Football Playoff Preview : Who Wins It All?

College Football Playoff Preview : Who Wins It All?

By : Sabri Haidar

(Photo/Rodney Cofield- The Mojo Network)

 

The 2025 College Football Playoff finally arrives after fourteen weeks of movement, multiple rankings updates and a Selection Sunday filled with confusion. This second year of the twelve team format includes two Group of Five programs, a new top seed going into the postseason and an SEC presence that accounts for nearly half the field. For bettors, the challenge is separating noise from traits. In playoff football, teams survive by leaning on one strength that can carry them under pressure or by covering the flaw most likely to collapse when the matchup tilts away from their script. Records matter far less now. The postseason becomes a test of who can control style and handle disruption and who loses identity when forced out of rhythm.

James Madison enters with a clear profile that rises and falls with its rushing attack. The Dukes are elite on the ground and strong defensively, but their passing production sits outside the top sixty, which creates a predictable ceiling. If an opponent turns them into a pass heavy offense, their entire structure becomes unstable. Oregon shows the opposite trait. The Ducks have one of the most complete offenses in the nation with top tier passing efficiency and the best rushing grade in the country. Their weakness is a defense that gives up ground. Oregon’s run defense and pass rush remain average, and that lack of disruption can become a problem against physical opponents.

Texas Tech arrives with the strongest defensive identity in the field. The Red Raiders rank number one in run defense, tackling, coverage and pass rush and they have created thirty one turnovers. This is the most playoff stable profile of the group because Tech can erase whatever an opponent does well. Alabama enters with a different problem. The Tide have excellent coverage but almost no consistent pressure and their inability to affect quarterbacks puts heavy strain on the back end. When combined with a below average run game and an offense that struggles to sustain rhythm, Alabama becomes dependent on slow games with limited possessions.

Oklahoma provides a front seven that top tier offenses must account for. The Sooners stop the run and disrupt timing, but their offense has been one of the least efficient groups in the playoff. Passing, rushing and blocking have all graded near the bottom of the field which makes them vulnerable against teams that can match physicality. Indiana stands out as the most balanced roster. The Hoosiers sit inside the top ten in passing, rushing, run defense, tackling, coverage and run blocking. They can win at any tempo and in any style without losing structure, which makes their profile one of the safest to scale in playoff games.

Tulane reaches the bracket with a defense that has struggled all season. The Green Wave rank poorly in run defense, tackling and coverage and tend to break down once an opponent finds rhythm. That makes them a likely early exit candidate. Ole Miss delivers explosive offense built on efficient passing and rushing, but the Rebels have major issues on both sides of the line. Their run blocking and pass rush sit near the bottom of the field, and against physical teams their production tends to fade late in games.

Georgia arrives with a defense built on disruption. The Bulldogs punish teams that require rhythm to operate, as seen in their work against Alabama, but quarterbacks who thrive outside structure can expose this unit in a semifinal or championship setting. Miami enters with one of the most volatile resumes in the field. The Hurricanes generate elite pressure but grade near the bottom nationally in missed tackles, which turns routine plays for opponents into explosive gains. Their offense is steady, but the defensive inconsistency makes them dangerous as an underdog without offering much long term reliability.

Texas A and M brings trench strength without trench dominance. The Aggies defend the run well and can pressure the passer, but their passing game ranks among the worst in the bracket. They can drag elite teams into uncomfortable games while lacking the dynamic offense needed to win a long playoff fight. Ohio State rounds out the field as a team built on precision. The Buckeyes excel in passing efficiency, run blocking, run defense and tackling, but their inability to create consistent pressure limits their ability to dictate matchups against high level offenses. They tend to thrive in clean, scripted games and struggle once forced to improvise.

Opening point spreads showed immediate disagreement among sportsbooks, especially for Alabama against Oklahoma. Some books listed Alabama as a small favorite, others opened with Oklahoma favored, and the consensus eventually settled around Alabama favored by one and a half points with a few pick'ems still on the board. Oddsmakers also adjusted Ole Miss lines significantly after the departure of Lane Kiffin. The Rebels were favored by more than three touchdowns when they played Tulane in September, but the playoff rematch opened at sixteen and a half. Oregon opened as a twenty one point favorite over James Madison, which would mark the largest spread ever posted for a College Football Playoff game. Under Dan Lanning, Oregon has won forty three straight games when favored by at least twenty points and has covered more often than not in those situations. Caesars reported limited early action on the opening lines, but noted movement on Ole Miss dipping below seventeen and Texas A and M being adjusted from three to four. The Aggies also carry the worst against the spread record of any playoff team at five and seven.

Handicappers provided their early playoff bets. Oklahoma plus one and a half against Alabama received support due to the expectation of cold weather, a low scoring environment and Oklahoma’s defensive edge. With quarterback John Mateer getting nearly three weeks of rest and Alabama dealing with a one dimensional offense that lacks a reliable run game, Oklahoma becomes the preferred side at home. Texas A and M minus three and a half against Miami is viewed as a favorable buy low opportunity due to strong home field advantage in the twelve team format and widespread mistrust of Miami in late game situations under Mario Cristobal.

For the national championship market, Indiana remains the most complete roster in the field and continues to be a strong prediction pick. Their blend of balance, physicality and mistake free football makes them a team without obvious holes. Ohio State is viewed as the most fragile of the favorites because of their lack of chaos creation on defense. Georgia sits overpriced relative to their offensive limitations and Texas Tech carries real danger but remains stylistically capped. For pure value, Oregon at plus seven fifty stands out because their offense is capable of breaking the defensive rhythm that makes Tech and Indiana so stable. The Ducks may not be the best overall team, but their upset equity is underpriced.

Back to blog